Proposals of #571

Update Community Burn Auction Maximum Caps For Auctioned Assets

Update Params
passed
Expected result
Turnout / Quorum
52.88% / 33.40%
Voting start 2025.10.16 at 23:10:32
Voting end 2025.10.20 at 23:10:32
70.41%
20 009 171 inj
Yes
0.00%
486 inj
No
0.00%
77 inj
Veto
29.59%
8 409 752 inj
Abstain

Details

logo
Proposer
inj1adpadycvjcxudy3up...
Total deposit
100 inj
Submit time
2025.10.16 at 23:10:32
Deposit end time
2025.10.18 at 23:10:32

Description

This proposal seeks to update parameters of the Auction Module to accommodate the new 28-day community burn cadence by scaling the maximum caps for auctioned assets. Specifically, we propose multiplying the current caps—designed for a 7-day cadence—by 4 to align with the 28-day cycle and ensure consistent capacity, participation, and burn throughput.

<strong>Summary of Changes:</strong>

  • <strong>inj_basket_max_cap:</strong> Update the maximum cap for the per-basket auction capacity from its current 7-day value to a 28-day equivalent by multiplying by 4. Maintains equivalent weekly capacity over the longer cadence, preventing artificial bottlenecks and enabling expected participation without fragmentation.
  • <strong>inj_auction_max_cap:</strong> Update the overall auction maximum cap from its current 7-day value to a 28-day equivalent by multiplying by 4. Ensures the global cap scales proportionally with the cadence change so the aggregate burn opportunity remains aligned with prior policy and community expectations.

<em>Note: This proposal makes no other functional changes to auction mechanics, eligibility, or distribution logic. It only rescales the relevant caps to match the 28-day cadence.</em>

<strong>Actions:</strong>

  • By voting YES on this proposal, you support scaling the inj_basket_max_cap and inj_auction_max_cap by 4× to align with the 28-day community burn cadence.
  • By voting NO on this proposal, you do not support these parameter changes.
  • By voting NO WITH VETO, you find this proposal to be spam/irrelevant/malicious, and support burning the 100 INJ deposit, if such votes are greater than ⅓ of the total voting power.
  • By voting ABSTAIN, you wish to contribute to quorum while formally declining to vote either for or against the proposal.

<em>Disclosure: I am a member of the Injective Labs team.</em>

Votes

Voter
Answer